Yup, Point the Finger at Us

In a recent post, I again touched on the theme of reaching a tipping point  in consciousness regarding Global Warming.  In that post, I mentioned early speculation about the up coming report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.  Well, the other day, evidently after a lot of last minute back and forth on language and tone, the Panel went public with their front page findings.

This leading group of climate scientists  concluded for the first time that global warming is “unequivocal” and went further to say that human activity, what we do every day, is ‘very likely’ the main factor in the rise of global temperatures since 1950.  [This should further confirm that Michael Crichton, is a novelist and a writer of fiction. I have heard one too many people source “State of Fear”, his novel about global warming as substantiation that global warming is a myth.  Please stop now.]  This was the panel’s fourth report since 1990 but was the first time stated with great certainty that the carbon dioxide and other emissions from human activities have been the main cause of warming during the past 50 years.

For all intents and purposes, the argument around the issue of human contribution to global warming is now over. Even the Texas oil man sitting in the White House embraced the findings of the panel.  Does any one want to be behind Bush on the global warming curve?  We are the primary cause.  What we all do every day, more or less, is what is causing global warming.  So let’s finally move on from this ‘debate’ to where we should be, which is to completely focus on changing our ways — personally, locally, nationally, globally.

In addition to the emphatic conclusion that there was global warming and that we are at cause, what really struck me about this report is the range of possibilities that the panel put forth regarding future scenarios.  The projected range of temperature increase for the remainder of this century was 3.5 to 8 degrees Fahrenheit if carbon dioxide in the atmosphere reaches twice what it was in 1750, at the beginning of the industrial revolution.  That is a wide range, with an equally wide range of consequences.  This warming has already set in motion a rise in sea levels globally.  The panel forecasts a rise of 7 to 23 inches by 2100.  That is, at the upper end, a staggering amount when compared to the rise of 6to 9 inches during the 20th century.  Think about all the shoreline erosion that has occurred in the past few decades.  Combine that with unbridled real estate development along every coast line in the world and we have a clear path toward destruction, economic calamity and death.

The upper ranges of all these scenarios result from models where emissions continue to grow unchecked.  The lower range assume some success by us to lower or reverse the rate of growth of all this garbage we throw into the atmosphere every second.  Even if we succeed in dramatically reducing our toxic atmospheric waste, we have already helped to trigger a new norm of continual climate change for the remainder of this century.  This comes after thousands of years of  relatively stable climate conditions.  The panel states that if greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in our atmosphere at even a moderate rate, average temperatures by the end of the century could match those last seen 125,000 years ago during the last warm period between ice ages.  The panel estimates that at that time sea levels were 12 to 20 feet higher than they are now.  That water is now in the ice caps that are melting with increasing speed.   Now that is a scary scenario. 

As Achim Steiner, the executive director of the United Nations Environmental Program, which oversees the panel said “In our daily lives we all respond urgently to dangers that are much less likely than climate change to affect the future of our children”

All of this reminds me of an old Richard Pryor comedy routine.  Pryor talks about trying to quick smoking cocaine with his friend Jim Brown, the great football running back..  Pryor talks about stopping in the future, maybe not, cutting down, maybe not.  To every statement Jim Brown says  “So whatcha’ gonna’ do?”  Remember, Pryor set himself on fire freebasing cocaine [ nice metaphor for global warming]. Now that this report puts us at cause for global warming, you have to ask yourself, you have to ask those wanting to lead us, you have to ask those that want to sell to us:  ‘Whatcha gonna do?”

Whatcha gonna do about global warming?

4 Responses to “Yup, Point the Finger at Us”

  1. James Says:

    Well I think if u dont belive any of these guys u should buy The Inconvient truth we will all see that we should have elected this fine man as our president in the first place and electing an oil hog like bush was a mistake. Global Warming will kill us all if it does not kill us then our kids will pay the price. So we should all find ways to keep emissions down….

    —–James

  2. Grant Says:

    Interesting post.

    However, maybe it’s the “engineer” side of me that wants to respond to the following quote from your post:

    “The panel states that if greenhouse gases continue to accumulate in our atmosphere at even a moderate rate, average temperatures by the end of the century could match those last seen 125,000 years ago during the last warm period between ice ages.”

    OK, so what caused the temperature to go up 125,000 years ago? It surely wasn’t automotive pollution or lack of emissions control.

    Scientifically, in comparing the climates of several periods in time, you can’t just assume that socio-economic habits of today are the cause of an environmental change just because those same habits didn’t exist X number of years ago.

    In addition, it seems the “point the finger at us crowd” (I mean no disrespect, David) has completely cast aside any scientific evidence that a natural climate cycle exists.

    Article: THE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF EARTH’S UNSTOPPABLE 1,500-YEAR CLIMATE CYCLE

    I’m not trying to sweep under the rug the effects we as human beings might have on the climate, or more importantly the atmosphere in which we live (lets face it, the Surgeon General has evidence that smog is bad for your health), but it seems the media, and even a select few high level enviro-scientists have turned this into the taboo topic of the here and now.

    Grant

  3. Dave Kustin Says:

    I just recently watched An Inconvenient Truth and it was nothing short of disturbing. The most disturbing part was the rise in sea level, which you touch on. As a resident of South Florida this hit particularly close to home.

    I felt a very real sense of panic after watching the movie and wondered what the modern nations (ie. USA) of the world are going to do…

  4. david Says:

    Grant-

    Yes I understand your point. The blended reality is that there is both a long rhythm cycle that is the Earth’s own and the affect that humanity has on the planet. All evidence points to the latter accelerating the former. The question is how much, and what might happen this time when the Earth warms up since it will be the first time that there are a lot of people for the first time. We have to take ownership of the consequences we create. If not, then we could be committing ‘species suicide’ though there would also be thousands of species we take down with us.

    David