The World Cup Points the Way
July 17th, 2006
All the yellow cards, red cards, fake injuries and head butts aside, the recently completed World Cup was a magnificent global phenomenon. The world came together around the single biggest sporting event on earth. It has always been the quadrennial big event, but this time there was a certain amplification that was different.
The first thing to point out is that, in the four years since the World Cup of 2002, there has been a growing recognition that we are all part of a global economy. Friedman’s “The World is Flat†came out in 2005. Every day there seems to be a story about either India or China and their exploding economies and how these economies are linking up with the United States and other countries. Also how these, and other economies, with their growth have put upward pressure on the price of energy and most commodities. Certainly in the United States, and I would venture to say in most countries, there is more of a sense of being a global citizen than in 2002. Since then, there have been tens, if not hundreds of millions of new high speed Internet connections to homes and businesses, and the number of people using wireless devices with net connectivity and video around the world has soared. All this made the World Cup 2006 more of an inclusive and readily available event than ever before.
The second thing to point out is that in the United States, the ratings soared over those in 2002. Most of this increase was due to the fact that the Cup was in Germany and not Korea and Japan and therefore the game times were better for US viewing. Nevertheless Americans watched in record numbers, despite the less than stellar performance by the American team. I was in an airport a couple of times when games were on in airport bars and restaurants and there were crowds of people crowding in front of the TVs, watching matches; a scene I have only seen for NFL play-offs or the World Series. This time, the World Cup has a resonance with Americans that seemed to be more than curiosity about this sport of soccer that everyone else calls football.What really hit home for me is that more than 300 million people watched the World Cup final between France and Italy live. Think about that, there were that many people doing the exact same thing, watching the same game, all at the same time. That is more people than the population of the United States right now. That audience is more than three times the worldwide audience of the Super Bowl. It was also estimated that the live audience, plus all the people that didn’t watch the game but saw highlights in the 24 hours after the game added up to almost 1 billion viewers. Even assuming duplication that is a staggering number.
We are moving toward a much more global society than exists today. We are all starting to think of ourselves as global citizens. We have all understood that we now live in a global economy, where something that happens in one part of the world affects the economies of countries all over the world. The Internet, communications satellites, live TV and billions of cell phones around the world have created a world where, in terms of communication, there is no longer any time and distance. When everything travels at the speed of light, and everything is always available, there is no sense of distance or time. Communicating via the Internet or via a wireless device with someone 10,000 miles away takes the same time as communicating with someone 10,000 feet or 10,000 inches away. So technology and communications is the first step. This first step has enabled us to gather around, log on or push a button so we can all watch a game in Berlin live.
Communications are global, the economy is becoming global and history teaches us that culture and politics follows economics. So we are, to a significant degree, moving toward a global culture. The World Cup points the way.A note to readers: Appropriately, this post was made from Berlin, at the beginning of a two week trip to Germany.
July 17th, 2006 at 10:04 am
The world cup that united us is in stark contrast to what is happening now in the Middle East. It always seems that the forces that unite the world community in harmony are always overpowered by the forces of violence, intolerance, and hatred.
Imran
July 18th, 2006 at 1:26 am
Middle East Peace is an oxymoron
Think of all the news stories you have watched or read about in your lifetime and remove all the ones concerning the Middle East.
Solving the problems of religious intolerance and dependency on oil will go a long way, but that is a massive task.
Keep the faith
David
July 18th, 2006 at 10:46 am
I really enjoy “The World is Flat” and I have also heard Friedman on Charlie Rose several times.
Very early in “The World is Flat,” Friedman notes that nationalism and terrorism are the two forces, which seem to be making their presence felt more and more, opposing flattening. In the middle east, both forces are heavily in play. In Russia and China, nationalism is very definitely a major factor. I do not have as strong opinions about Indian nationalism
August 15th, 2006 at 7:09 am
“We are all starting to think of ourselves as global citizens. We have all understood that we now live in a global economy, where something that happens in one part of the world affects the economies of countries all over the world.”
Although I am optimistic about this direction, I think that is an overstatement. “We are all”…disagree. Maybe 20%.
“The Internet, communications satellites, live TV and billions of cell phones around the world have created a world where, in terms of communication, there is no longer any time and distance.”
As much as I’m a techie and value the benefits and opportunities that the Internet, etc have created, I think that you’re thinking is far ahead of the reality in regards to “…there is no longer any time and distance.” Leading with vision you are, but not to confuse that with the present state of affairs.
“Middle East Peace is an oxymoron” – I think that’s strong language. There might actually be a chance for peace in the Middle East if it were not for the meddling ways of countries like the U.S. and Britain. The problems associated with religious intolerance, terrorism and nationalism are not much different than the mass consumerism, ignorance, arrogance, deception, fraud and selfishness displayed throughout our country, by leaders and citizens alike. We should look in the mirror more closely before casting too many stones. If we don’t even understand ourselves and what made us go so far south, how can we begin to judge other cultures and people?
August 15th, 2006 at 7:35 am
Mando-
I understand your point of view, but to some of your points:
Middle east peace is an oxymoron. Perhaps it might not be in the future, but during my entire life there has not be any 3 year period when there has not be killing and conflict in that region. Peace there is like the adage about going to a hockey game: “went to a hockey game and during the fighting, a game broke out” There is peace and there is a temporary truce. Regardless of who is to blame or who is meddling, there has not been peace in the middle east.
As for your comment on global citizens, please understand the critical mass theory. You may be right about the 20% figure, but that is a huge number. In the advertising industry there is and has been much consternation about Tivo and DVRs changing the way people watch TV, about how people fast forward through commercials etc. Well, right now only 10% of TV households have DVRs and yet that has caused the entire industry to change.
Thanks for you thoughtful comments.
David
July 16th, 2014 at 4:22 pm
[…] realized that eight years ago, in the early months of this blog, I had written a column about the 2006 World Cup in this space. The focus then as now is on how our accelerating electronic connectedness is […]